Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Housing by Region

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homeownership

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Homeownership

Value
Compared to:

Homeownership Region: Mid-County

Current Value:

Homeownership Region: Mid-County

60.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mid-County has a value of 60.1% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mid-County has a value of 60.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (54.4%), Mid-County has a value of 60.1% which is higher and better.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (51.4%), Mid-County has a value of 60.1% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Mid-County has a value of 60.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mid-County value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeownership Region: North County

Current Value:

Homeownership Region: North County

51.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, North County has a value of 51.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, North County has a value of 51.2% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (54.4%), North County has a value of 51.2% which is lower and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (51.4%), North County has a value of 51.2% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), North County has a value of 51.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the North County value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeownership Region: San Lorenzo Valley

Current Value:
68.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 68.9% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 68.9% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (54.4%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 68.9% which is higher and better.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (51.4%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 68.9% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 68.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the San Lorenzo Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Homeownership Region: South County

Current Value:

Homeownership Region: South County

50.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, South County has a value of 50.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.6%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, South County has a value of 50.8% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (54.4%), South County has a value of 50.8% which is lower and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (51.4%), South County has a value of 50.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(51.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), South County has a value of 50.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the South County value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Value
Compared to:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Region: Mid-County

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Region: Mid-County

49.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mid-County has a value of 49.8% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.1% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mid-County has a value of 49.8% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (52.7%), Mid-County has a value of 49.8% which is lower and better.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), Mid-County has a value of 49.8% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Mid-County has a value of 49.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mid-County value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Region: North County

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Region: North County

53.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, North County has a value of 53.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.1% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, North County has a value of 53.5% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (52.7%), North County has a value of 53.5% which is higher and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), North County has a value of 53.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), North County has a value of 53.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the North County value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Region: San Lorenzo Valley

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Region: San Lorenzo Valley

51.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 51.5% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.1% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 51.5% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (52.7%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 51.5% which is lower and better.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 51.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 51.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the San Lorenzo Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Region: South County

Current Value:

Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent Region: South County

54.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, South County has a value of 54.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 53.1% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 55.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, South County has a value of 54.5% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (52.7%), South County has a value of 54.5% which is higher and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(52.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (54.4%), South County has a value of 54.5% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(54.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), South County has a value of 54.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the South County value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Santa Cruz