Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

Value
Compared to:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions County: Santa Cruz

Current Value:

Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions County: Santa Cruz

8.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 8.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 57 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (10.7), Santa Cruz has a value of 8.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(10.7)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Santa Cruz has a value of 8.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Santa Cruz (8.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.3).
Prior Value
(8.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Santa Cruz value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)

Community / Transportation

Bicycle-Involved Collision Rate

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Bicycle-Involved Collision Rate

Value
Compared to:

Bicycle-Involved Collision Rate County: Santa Cruz

Current Value:

Bicycle-Involved Collision Rate County: Santa Cruz

0.0
Collisions per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0.
CA Counties
(2022)
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to the CA Value (0.3), Santa Cruz has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(0.3)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Santa Cruz (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (61.5).
Prior Value
(61.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Santa Cruz value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Bikeway Miles

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Bikeway Miles

Value
Compared to:

Bikeway Miles County: Santa Cruz

Current Value:

Bikeway Miles County: Santa Cruz

229
Miles
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Santa Cruz (229) is greater and better than the previously measured value (227).
Prior Value
(227)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Santa Cruz value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Community Spending on Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Community Spending on Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Community Spending on Transportation County: Santa Cruz

Current Value:

Community Spending on Transportation County: Santa Cruz

15.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the CA Value (15.7%), Santa Cruz has a value of 15.0%.
CA Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (17.4%), Santa Cruz has a value of 15.0%.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Santa Cruz (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Community Spending on Transportation Region: Mid-County

Current Value:

Community Spending on Transportation Region: Mid-County

14.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (15.0%), Mid-County has a value of 14.6%.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.7%), Mid-County has a value of 14.6%.
CA Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (17.4%), Mid-County has a value of 14.6%.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Mid-County (14.6%) is greater  than the previously measured value (14.5%).
Prior Value
(14.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Community Spending on Transportation Region: North County

Current Value:

Community Spending on Transportation Region: North County

14.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (15.0%), North County has a value of 14.5%.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.7%), North County has a value of 14.5%.
CA Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (17.4%), North County has a value of 14.5%.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, North County (14.5%) is less  than the previously measured value (14.6%).
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Community Spending on Transportation Region: San Lorenzo Valley

Current Value:

Community Spending on Transportation Region: San Lorenzo Valley

15.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (15.0%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 15.3%.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.7%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 15.3%.
CA Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (17.4%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 15.3%.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, San Lorenzo Valley (15.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.3%).
Prior Value
(15.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Community Spending on Transportation Region: South County

Current Value:

Community Spending on Transportation Region: South County

16.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (15.0%), South County has a value of 16.4%.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (15.7%), South County has a value of 16.4%.
CA Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (17.4%), South County has a value of 16.4%.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, South County (16.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.4%).
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Community / Transportation

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio

Value
Compared to:

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio County: Santa Cruz

Current Value:

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio County: Santa Cruz

2.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 2.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 2.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (3.0%), Santa Cruz has a value of 2.7% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Santa Cruz (2.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.7%).
Prior Value
(2.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio Region: Mid-County

Current Value:

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio Region: Mid-County

2.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mid-County has a value of 2.3% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mid-County has a value of 2.3% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (2.7%), Mid-County has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.0%), Mid-County has a value of 2.3% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, Mid-County (2.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.3%).
Prior Value
(2.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio Region: North County

Current Value:

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio Region: North County

2.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, North County has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, North County has a value of 2.5% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (2.7%), North County has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.0%), North County has a value of 2.5% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, North County (2.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.5%).
Prior Value
(2.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio Region: San Lorenzo Valley

Current Value:

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio Region: San Lorenzo Valley

2.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 2.1% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 2.1% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (2.7%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.0%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 2.1% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, San Lorenzo Valley (2.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2.0%).
Prior Value
(2.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio Region: South County

Current Value:

Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio Region: South County

3.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, South County has a value of 3.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, South County has a value of 3.6% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (2.7%), South County has a value of 3.6% which is higher and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.0%), South County has a value of 3.6% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the prior value, South County (3.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Community / Transportation

Households with No Car and Low Access to a Grocery Store

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Households with No Car and Low Access to a Grocery Store

Value
Compared to:

Households with No Car and Low Access to a Grocery Store County: Santa Cruz

Current Value:

Households with No Car and Low Access to a Grocery Store County: Santa Cruz

0.9%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 0.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.3%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 0.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Santa Cruz (0.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.9%).
Prior Value
(0.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Community / Transportation

Mean Travel Time to Work

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Mean Travel Time to Work

Value
Compared to:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Santa Cruz

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work County: Santa Cruz

26.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 26.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 26.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2), Santa Cruz has a value of 26.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Santa Cruz has a value of 26.7.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Cruz value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Region: Mid-County

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Region: Mid-County

28.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mid-County has a value of 28.2 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mid-County has a value of 28.2 which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (26.7), Mid-County has a value of 28.2 which is higher and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2), Mid-County has a value of 28.2 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Mid-County has a value of 28.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mid-County value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Region: North County

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Region: North County

24.0
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, North County has a value of 24.0 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, North County has a value of 24.0 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (26.7), North County has a value of 24.0 which is lower and better.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2), North County has a value of 24.0 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), North County has a value of 24.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the North County value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Region: San Lorenzo Valley

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Region: San Lorenzo Valley

36.0
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 36.0 which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 36.0 which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (26.7), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 36.0 which is higher and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 36.0 which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 36.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the San Lorenzo Valley value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Mean Travel Time to Work Region: South County

Current Value:

Mean Travel Time to Work Region: South County

27.7
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, South County has a value of 27.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.6 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.0.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, South County has a value of 27.7 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (26.7), South County has a value of 27.7 which is higher and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (29.2), South County has a value of 27.7 which is lower and better.
CA Value
(29.2)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), South County has a value of 27.7 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the South County value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Residents Reporting Traffic Taking Away from Quality of Life

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Residents Reporting Traffic Taking Away from Quality of Life

Value
Compared to:

Residents Reporting Traffic Taking Away from Quality of Life County: Santa Cruz

Current Value:

Residents Reporting Traffic Taking Away from Quality of Life County: Santa Cruz

19.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Santa Cruz (19.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.6%).
Prior Value
(19.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Santa Cruz value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Value
Compared to:

Solo Drivers with a Long Commute County: Santa Cruz

Current Value:

Solo Drivers with a Long Commute County: Santa Cruz

37.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 37.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 42.8%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 37.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (41.6%), Santa Cruz has a value of 37.4% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(41.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Santa Cruz has a value of 37.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Santa Cruz (37.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.0%).
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Santa Cruz value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation County: Santa Cruz

Current Value:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation County: Santa Cruz

1.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 1.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 1.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6%), Santa Cruz has a value of 1.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Santa Cruz has a value of 1.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Cruz value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Region: Mid-County

Current Value:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Region: Mid-County

1.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mid-County has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mid-County has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (1.8%), Mid-County has a value of 1.0% which is lower and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6%), Mid-County has a value of 1.0% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Mid-County has a value of 1.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mid-County value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Region: North County

Current Value:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Region: North County

2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, North County has a value of 2.9% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, North County has a value of 2.9% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (1.8%), North County has a value of 2.9% which is higher and better.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6%), North County has a value of 2.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), North County has a value of 2.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the North County value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Region: San Lorenzo Valley

Current Value:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Region: San Lorenzo Valley

1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 1.1% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 1.1% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (1.8%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 1.1% which is lower and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 1.1% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 1.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the San Lorenzo Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Region: South County

Current Value:

Workers Commuting by Public Transportation Region: South County

0.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, South County has a value of 0.8% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, South County has a value of 0.8% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (1.8%), South County has a value of 0.8% which is lower and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (3.6%), South County has a value of 0.8% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), South County has a value of 0.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the South County value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

Community / Transportation

Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Value
Compared to:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work County: Santa Cruz

Current Value:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work County: Santa Cruz

64.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 64.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 64.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (68.4%), Santa Cruz has a value of 64.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(68.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Santa Cruz has a value of 64.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Cruz value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Region: Mid-County

Current Value:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Region: Mid-County

64.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mid-County has a value of 64.9% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mid-County has a value of 64.9% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (64.2%), Mid-County has a value of 64.9% which is higher and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(64.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (68.4%), Mid-County has a value of 64.9% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(68.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Mid-County has a value of 64.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mid-County value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Region: North County

Current Value:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Region: North County

59.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, North County has a value of 59.2% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, North County has a value of 59.2% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (64.2%), North County has a value of 59.2% which is lower and better.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(64.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (68.4%), North County has a value of 59.2% which is lower and better.
CA Value
(68.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), North County has a value of 59.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the North County value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Region: San Lorenzo Valley

Current Value:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Region: San Lorenzo Valley

68.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 68.9% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 68.9% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (64.2%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 68.9% which is higher and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(64.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (68.4%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 68.9% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(68.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 68.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the San Lorenzo Valley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Region: South County

Current Value:

Workers who Drive Alone to Work Region: South County

70.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, South County has a value of 70.7% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 73.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 76.4%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, South County has a value of 70.7% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (64.2%), South County has a value of 70.7% which is higher and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(64.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (68.4%), South County has a value of 70.7% which is higher and worse.
CA Value
(68.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), South County has a value of 70.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the South County value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Workers who Walk to Work

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

Workers who Walk to Work

Value
Compared to:

Workers who Walk to Work County: Santa Cruz

Current Value:

Workers who Walk to Work County: Santa Cruz

4.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Santa Cruz has a value of 4.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4%), Santa Cruz has a value of 4.6% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Santa Cruz has a value of 4.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Santa Cruz value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Walk to Work Region: Mid-County

Current Value:

Workers who Walk to Work Region: Mid-County

3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, Mid-County has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.2% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Mid-County has a value of 3.3% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (4.6%), Mid-County has a value of 3.3% which is lower and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4%), Mid-County has a value of 3.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Mid-County has a value of 3.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Mid-County value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Walk to Work Region: North County

Current Value:

Workers who Walk to Work Region: North County

7.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, North County has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.2% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, North County has a value of 7.3% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (4.6%), North County has a value of 7.3% which is higher and better.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4%), North County has a value of 7.3% which is higher and better.
CA Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), North County has a value of 7.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the North County value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Walk to Work Region: San Lorenzo Valley

Current Value:

Workers who Walk to Work Region: San Lorenzo Valley

1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 1.3% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.2% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 1.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (4.6%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 1.3% which is lower and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 1.3% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), San Lorenzo Valley has a value of 1.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the San Lorenzo Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Workers who Walk to Work Region: South County

Current Value:

Workers who Walk to Work Region: South County

1.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to CA Counties, South County has a value of 1.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.2% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.5%.
CA Counties
The distribution is based on data from 58 California counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, South County has a value of 1.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the Santa Cruz, CA County Value (4.6%), South County has a value of 1.9% which is lower and worse.
Santa Cruz, CA County Value
(4.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Santa Cruz County value.
Compared to the CA Value (2.4%), South County has a value of 1.9% which is lower and worse.
CA Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the California state value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), South County has a value of 1.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the South County value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Santa Cruz